Need help with draft question
Module Five Activity Guidelines and Rubric.html
IDS 400 Module Five Activity Guidelines and Rubric
Overview
An essential part of developing critical analysis skills is self-reflection. In this activity, you will have the opportunity to consider how critically analyzing your topic of diversity has affected your life and how you view the world around you. This is your time to think about your personal experiences and your beliefs, assumptions, and values. Completing this activity will result in a draft of the reflection section of your project. It also provides an opportunity to obtain valuable feedback from your instructor that you can incorporate into your project submission.
Directions
In this activity, you will describe how using critical analysis influences your life and your perspectives. First, you will describe how critical analysis skills have affected your personal experience. Next, you will describe how examining your bias has influenced how you perceive the world. Finally, you will explain how critical analysis skills can positively impact your academic or professional lives.
Specifically, you must address the following rubric criteria:
- Describe how critically analyzing your topic has positively informed your personal experience.
- Describe how examining your bias has altered the way you perceive the world.
- Explain how critically analyzing diversity can positively influence your field of study or profession.
What to Submit
Submit your short paper as a 1- to 2-page Microsoft Word document with double spacing, 12-point Times New Roman font, and one-inch margins. Sources should be cited according to APA style. Consult the
Shapiro Library APA Style Guide for more information on citations.
Module Five Activity Rubric
Criteria | Proficient (100%) | Needs Improvement (75%) | Not Evident (0%) | Value |
---|---|---|---|---|
Personal Experience | Describes how critically analyzing the topic has positively informed personal experiences | Shows progress toward proficiency, but with errors or omissions; areas for improvement may include connecting critical analysis of topic to personal experience or providing more detail about that connection | Does not attempt criterion | 30 |
Bias | Describes how examining bias has altered ways of perceiving the world | Shows progress toward proficiency, but with errors or omissions; areas for improvement may include connecting the examination of bias to perceptions or providing more detail about that connection | Does not attempt criterion | 30 |
Field of Study or Profession | Explains how critically analyzing diversity can positively influence field of study or profession | Shows progress toward proficiency, but with errors or omissions; areas for improvement may include connecting the critical analysis of diversity to field of study or profession or providing more detail about that connection | Does not attempt criterion | 30 |
Articulation of Response | Clearly conveys meaning with correct grammar, sentence structure, and spelling, demonstrating an understanding of audience and purpose | Shows progress toward proficiency, but with errors in grammar, sentence structure, and spelling, negatively impacting readability | Submission has critical errors in grammar, sentence structure, and spelling, preventing understanding of ideas | 10 |
Total: | 100% |