1. For Mill, consequences give acts their moral value and for Kant, it is an act’s motives that matter. Explain, using three examples, how these two philosophers would evaluate actions from their unique perspectives. Either agree or disagree with this statement giving reasons and examples.( 400 words in 5 hours )
2. Explain fully what a “slippery slope argument” is. Explain how it is used in a philosophical argument in both the readings on abortion and euthanasia. Evaluate the effectiveness of the arguments you choose.( 400 words in 5 hours )