Read Legal Puzzle 2-2, which I have posted in your legal puzzle 1. Answer the question posed in the puzzle, and explain your reasoning. In light of decisions such as Hudson v. Michigan, (full decision in Course Materials) where it was determined that a 4th Amendment rule violation would not always require evidence suppression, should the evidence be excluded in this case if a violation of Mr. Rowleys rights occurred, or is his only remedy civil in nature? Why?